ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

The Role of Impact Inscription in Shaping Moral Markets: Insights from Spain's Impact Investing Sector

Abstract

This study investigates the role of impact inscription in shaping moral markets, with a particular focus on Spain's impact investing sector. By embedding principles, objectives, and values into measurement tools, market practices are transformed to address social and environmental challenges. The research explores five key dimensions: defining moral market boundaries, accounting for social issues, governance structure redefinition, market emergence influence, and the challenges associated with impact washing. Employing a qualitative methodology, the study analyzes data collected over six years through interviews, observations, and document analysis to uncover the mechanisms of impact inscription. Findings reveal that clear boundary-setting, integrated social accounting, adaptive governance models, strategic market growth initiatives, and robust impact measurement frameworks contribute to enhanced trust and legitimacy in moral markets. The study concludes that impact inscription serves as a critical driver for evolving market dynamics, yet challenges remain in standardizing measurement frameworks and mitigating impact washing. Future research should explore these dynamics in diverse contexts using mixed methodologies to broaden understanding and applicability.

References

  1. Nicholls, A. (2010). The institutionalization of social investment: The interplay of investment logics and investor rationalities. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 70-100.
  2. Korth, P., Busch, T., & Johnson, M. (2018). Measuring impact in impact investing: The role of standards and metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1235-1245.
  3. Jackson, E. T. (2013). Interrogating the theory of change: Evaluating impact investing where it matters most. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 3(2), 95-110.
  4. Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
  5. Weber, O. (2016). Social banking: The role of financial institutions in addressing sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 1-3.
  6. Siqueira, A. C. O., Guenster, N., Vanacker, T., & Crucke, S. (2018). A longitudinal perspective on social entrepreneurship, sustainability, and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 1-20.
  7. Ebrahim, A., Rangan, V. K. (2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118-141.
  8. Hainmueller, J., Hiscox, M. J., & Sequeira, S. (2015). Consumer demand for the fair trade label: Evidence from a multi-store field experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(2), 242-256.
  9. Scholtens, B. (2006). Finance as a driver of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 19-33.
  10. Barman, E. (2016). Caring capitalism: The meaning and measure of social value. Cambridge University Press.
Download PDF

How to Cite

Kanchan Vishwakarma, (2025-02-21 14:45:23.288). The Role of Impact Inscription in Shaping Moral Markets: Insights from Spain's Impact Investing Sector. Abhi International Journal of Management Studies, Volume hfkvqQvJOOQfQ4jxyAbR, Issue 1.