ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

Differentiated Impression Management in Business Networks: Managing Organizational Malfeasance

Abstract

This study examines how organizations within a business network employ differentiated impression management strategies to mitigate adverse evaluations resulting from an affiliate’s misconduct. By addressing five key sub-research questions—technical versus ceremonial tactics, conditions for successful differentiation, impact of historical wrongdoing, risks of coordinated strategies, and stakeholder perceptions of intentionality—this research offers new insights into the interactive dynamics of impression management. Utilizing a qualitative methodology, experimental studies were analyzed to explore the effectiveness of strategic differentiation in preserving organizational reputation. The findings indicate that successful differentiation relies on a combination of technical and ceremonial tactics, stakeholder perception management, and strategic timing. Furthermore, the research highlights the risks of perceived collusion when firms coordinate strategies too closely. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of reputation management within interconnected business environments, offering theoretical and practical implications for organizational behavior and corporate communication.

References

  1. Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176.
  2. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
  3. Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. SAGE Publications.
  4. Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177-186.
  5. Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091-1112.
  6. Elsbach, K. D. (2003). Organizational perception management. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 297-332.
  7. Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006). The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organization Science, 17(1), 101-117.
  8. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177-194.
  9. Fombrun, C. J., & Van Riel, C. B. (2004). Fame & fortune: How successful companies build winning reputations. FT Press.
  10. Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 153-184.
Download PDF

How to Cite

Pankaj Pachauri, (2025-02-21 14:43:10.279). Differentiated Impression Management in Business Networks: Managing Organizational Malfeasance. Abhi International Journal of Management Studies, Volume hfkvqQvJOOQfQ4jxyAbR, Issue 1.