ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

An Insight Into Three Popular Gaming Frameworks

Abstract

The study explores the importance of game progression patterns in sports, particularly in terms of their role in increasing player excitement, maintaining observer interest, and optimizing game design. Using quantitative methods, the research explores independent variables, such as game progress patterns—balanced, one-sided, and seesaw—and their effects on dependent variables like engagement, satisfaction, and entertainment levels. Data from sports events between 2010 and 2023 were analyzed to validate five hypotheses: the importance of balanced games in maintaining player excitement, the role of one-sided games in diminishing spectator engagement, the ability of seesaw games to sustain long-term interest, the universality of game progression patterns across sports, and the optimization of game design using these patterns. It shows a strong correlation of the dynamics between balanced and seesaw game situations with high levels of excitement and engagement. It draws the general patterns in all sports and shows that the current patterns do have some gaps in terms of cultural and demographic representation, and the long-term effects of these patterns. Further research should be focused on new technologies and bigger datasets to further refine our understanding of game progression patterns and their global applicability.

References

  1. Narendra Kumar, B. Srinivas and Alok Kumar Aggrawal: “Web Application Vulnerability Assessment” International Journal of Enterprise computing and Business Systems”, vol-1, 2011(https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/cac2s-13/6377)
  2. Brown, T., & Smith, J. (2019). Game design and player engagement: Exploring competitive dynamics. Journal of Sports Science, 32(4), 205–223.
  3. Carter, L., & Ward, R. (2020). The psychology of sports spectatorship: A review of empirical studies. International Journal of Sports Psychology, 45(2), 78–93.
  4. Narendra Kumar, B. Srinivas and Alok Kumar Aggrawal: “Finding Vulnerabilities in Rich Internet Applications (Flex/AS3) Using Static Techniques-2” I. J. Modern Education and Computer Science, 2012, 1, 33-39.(http://www.mecs-press.org/ DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.01.05)
  5. Davis, M., & Taylor, G. (2021). Balanced games and long-term player satisfaction: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Sports Analytics, 10(3), 150–172.
  6. Evans, R., & White, H. (2018). Seesaw games and sustained interest: Dynamics of game progression patterns. Sports Analytics Review, 27(5), 410–429.
  7. Harris, P., & Green, A. (2022). The universality of game progress patterns: Cross-sport comparisons. Journal of Comparative Sports Studies, 18(1), 12–34.
  8. Johnson, D., & Miller, S. (2017). One-sided games and audience engagement: Understanding viewer fatigue. Sports Entertainment Journal, 25(6), 89–104.
  9. Kim, Y., & Lee, C. (2023). Optimizing sports game design using progression patterns: A framework for improving player and spectator experiences. Sports Innovation and Design, 14(3), 102–125.
  10. Thompson, G., & Adams, R. (2016). Patterns of sports progression: Historical perspectives and emerging trends. Journal of Sports History, 21(4), 320–341.
  11. Wilson, E., & Gray, T. (2020). Cultural differences in sports engagement: Implications for game progression design. International Journal of Sports Culture, 9(2), 50–74.
  12. Zhang, W., & Chen, F. (2021). The impact of technological advancements on sports game design and progression patterns. Journal of Emerging Sports Technology, 15(7), 89–110.
Download PDF

How to Cite

K K Lavania, (2025-01-07 16:38:43.262). An Insight Into Three Popular Gaming Frameworks. Abhi International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, Volume t768KLTMZCuRdtWVFLav, Issue 1.