ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

ROI-Based Enhancement Techniques for Improved Mammogram Image Quality

Abstract

Breast cancer is a significant health concern, affecting one in eight women during their lifetime. Early detection plays a crucial role in reducing the risks associated with the disease, and mammography has proven to be an effective screening method. Mammograms often show early signs of breast cancer, such as microcalcifications, which appear as white spots on the images. However, the accuracy of early detection depends not only on the quality of the mammograms but also on the ability of radiologists to interpret them correctly. This research focuses on enhancing poor-quality mammogram images, specifically improving the Region of Interest (ROI). The paper details the image enhancement techniques used to improve mammogram quality, ensuring clearer visualization of critical features such as microcalcifications. By applying these methods, the paper aims to provide better tools for radiologists, improving the early detection and diagnosis of breast cancer.

References

  1. American College of Radiology. (2021). ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Screening and Diagnostic Mammography. Retrieved from https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria
  2. Dromain, C., & Sardanelli, F. (2019). Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Review of its Effectiveness. European Journal of Radiology, 114, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.006
  3. Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Image Enhancement Techniques in Mammography: A Review. Journal of Digital Imaging, 32(2), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00219-x
  4. Radiological Society of North America. (2020). Radiology Guidelines for Screening Mammography. Retrieved from https://www.rsna.org/Research-and-Education/Research-Resources
  5. Shen, S., & Zhang, H. (2021). Effectiveness of AI in Mammogram Analysis for Breast Cancer Detection: A Comparative Study. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 114, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.01.003
  6. Soo, M. S., & Hylton, N. M. (2017). Advanced Mammographic Imaging Technologies: A Review of Their Impact on Breast Cancer Screening. Seminars in Roentgenology, 52(3), 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sro.2017.02.008
  7. P. Janani, J. Premaladha and K. S. Ravichandran. 2015. Image Enhancement Techniques: A Study.Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 8(22)
  8. M. Bitenc, D. S. Kieffer, K. Khoshelham. 2015.Evaluation of Wavelet Denoising Methods for Small-Scale Joint Roughness Estimation Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Vol. II-3/W5
  9. Peyman Rahmati, GhassanHamarneh, Doron Nussbaum, and Andy Adler, "A New Preprocessing Filter for Digital Mammograms," Dept. of System and computer Engineering, Carleton University, ON, Canada, 2012
  10. Mariam Biltawi, Nijad al Najdawi, Sara Tedmori, "Mammogram Enhancement and Segmentation methods: Classification, Analysis andEvaluation, “The 13th International Arab conference on information Technology, 2012
  11. Abdel-Zaher, A. M., &Eldeib, A. M. (2016). Breast cancer classification using deep belief networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 2016(46), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.015. Chaubey, A. K. (2016). Comparison of the local and global thresholding methods in image segmentation. World Journal of Research and Review, 2(1), 1–4. de Lima, S. M., da Silva-Filho, A. G., & Dos Santos, W. P. (2016).Detection and classification of masses in mammographicimages in a multi kernel approach. Computer Methodsand Programs in Biomedicine, 134, 11–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.04.029. Huang, C., & Zhu, Y. (2012). An improved median filtering algorithm for image noise reduction. Physics Procedia, 25,609–616. [15] Mammographic Mass Characteristics. (2017). Mass shape,margin and density as found with screening mammography. Retrieved from http://breast-cancer.ca/mass-chars/
  12. Talha, M. (2016). Classification of mammograms for breast cancer detection using fusion of discrete cosine transform and discrete wavelet transform features. Biomedical Research, 27(2), 322–327. [17] Valarmathi, P., & Robinson, S. (2016). An improved neural networks for mammogram classification using genetic optimization. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 6(7), 1631– 1635.https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2016.1862
  13. Wang, L., & Xu, Z. (2020). The Role of Technology in Radiology: Impact of Digital Mammography and AI Integration. Journal of Medical Imaging, 5(4), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.4.040501
Download PDF

How to Cite

Dalia Mohamed Younis, (2025-02-17 00:36:55.107). ROI-Based Enhancement Techniques for Improved Mammogram Image Quality. Abhi International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, Volume UnPeQLaeyAt5GGB4p6JO, Issue 1.