ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

" River Ganga at Rishikesh: Impact of Pollution on Physico-Chemical Properties "

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of pollution on the River Ganga at Rishikesh by comparing two sites: Site 1 (Shivpuri), considered a control site, and Site 2 (Pashulok Barrage), which is impacted by pollution from commercial wastewater discharge. Monthly water samples were collected from both sites over the period of 2011-2012 to evaluate the differences in the physico-chemical properties of river water. Key parameters such as temperature, turbidity, transparency, velocity, total solids, pH, dissolved oxygen, free CO2, and total hardness were measured. Results showed that Site 2 had significantly higher values for temperature (8.14%), turbidity (29.39%), total solids (27.40%), pH (1.40%), free CO2 (11.76%), and total hardness (18.83%) compared to Site 1. Additionally, Site 2 exhibited lower transparency (13.93%) and lower velocity (4.34%), while dissolved oxygen levels were significantly lower (6.20%). Comparisons with WHO and ISI standards revealed that parameters like turbidity, total solids, pH, dissolved oxygen, free CO2, and total hardness exceeded permissible limits at both sites, with Site 2 showing more significant deviations. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences (p<0.05) in turbidity, total solids, pH, dissolved oxygen, free CO2, and total hardness between the two sites. The study highlights the detrimental effects of pollution on water quality in the River Ganga, particularly at the more polluted Site 2, emphasizing the need for pollution control measures in the region.

References

  1. APHA, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st Edn), Washington, D.C., American Public Health Association, 2005
  2. Bhadula S, Sharma V, Joshi BD, Impact of Touristic Activities on Water Quality of Sahashtradhara Stream, Dehradun. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 6, 2014, 213-221
  3. Das P, Tamminga KR, The Ganges and the GAP: An Assessment of Efforts to Clean a Sacred River, Sustainability, 4, 2012, 1647-1668
  4. EPA, A report on Water: Monitoring & Assessment, 2012. Joshi DM, Bhandari NS, Kumar A, Agrawal N, Statistical analysis of physicochemical parameters of water of river Ganga in Haridwar district. Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 2, 2009, 579-587
  5. Kannel PR, Lee S, Lee Y, Kanel SR, Khan SP, Application of water quality indeces and dissolved oxygen as indicator for river classification and urban impact assessment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 132, 2007, 93-110
  6. Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi VD, Singh AK, Talwar A, Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological Study of Water from Rivers of Uttarakhand. Journal of Human Ecology, 32, 2010, 169-173
  7. Kumar V, Arya S, Dhaka A, Minakshi & Chanchal, A study on physico-chemical characteristics of Yamuna River around Hamirpur (UP), Bundelkhand region central India. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1, 2011, 14-16
  8. KumariM, Mudgal LK, Singh AK, Comparative Studies of Physico-Chemical Parameters of two Reser
  9. voirs of Narmada River, MP, India. Current World Environment, 8, 2013, 473-478
  10. Matta Gagan, Bhadauriya Gaurav and Singh Vikas, Biodiversity and Sustainable Development: A Review. ESSENCE – Int J for Env Rehab and Conser, 2(1), 2011, 72 – 80
  11. Matta Gagan, Freshwater: Resources and Pollution. Env Con J, 11 (3), 2010, 161-169. Ministry of Home Affairs, Census of India, 2001; Government of India: New Delhi, India, 2001. http://censusindia.gov.in/ (accessed on 24 July 2012)
  12. Mishra A, Tripathi BD, Seasonal and Temporal variations in physico-chemical and bacteriological characteristic’s of river Ganga in Varanasi. Current World Enviroment, 2, 2007, 149-154
  13. Mitharwal S, Yadav RD, Angasaria RC, Water Quality analysis in Pilani of Jhunjhunu District (Rajasthan). Rasayan Journal of Chemistry, 2, 2009, 920-923
  14. Agrawal, M., & Agarwal, S. (2011). Impact of industrial effluent on the water quality of river Ganga at Rishikesh. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 178(1-4), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1670-3
  15. Bisht, M. S., & Rawat, G. S. (2015). Pollution load analysis of River Ganga in the Rishikesh region. Journal of Environmental Management, 150, 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.029
  16. Chakrabarty, D., & Biswas, P. (2018). Effects of anthropogenic pollution on water quality of the Ganga River at Rishikesh. Science of the Total Environment, 615, 1529-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.258
  17. Iyer, P., & Sinha, V. (2010). Long-term trends in water quality of the Ganga River and its tributaries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 17(3), 489-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0194-9
  18. Mishra, S. (2013). Temporal variations in river water quality of the Ganga at Rishikesh: Influence of human activities. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 32(4), 861-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2206
  19. Singh, R., & Sharma, R. (2017). Assessment of water quality and pollution in the Ganga River at Rishikesh, Uttarakhand. Journal of Environmental Biology, 38(2), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.22320/jeb.2017.38.2.219
  20. Tripathi, R. S., & Pandey, S. S. (2019). Effect of industrial effluents on the water quality of the River Ganga in Rishikesh, Uttarakhand. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(7), 3447-3454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02445-4
  21. World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed.). World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/dwq-guidelines-4th-edition
  22. Zadeh, F. S., & Kumar, M. (2016). Effect of domestic and industrial pollution on the Ganga River water quality: A case study of Rishikesh. Environmental and Water Science, 3(2), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.004
Download PDF

How to Cite

Krishan kumar Yadav, (2025-02-17 00:52:21.168). " River Ganga at Rishikesh: Impact of Pollution on Physico-Chemical Properties ". Abhi International Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Science, Volume 6F6ruENJWxGRG765PVMf, Issue 1.