ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

Evaluating Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques in Stroke Risk Prediction

Abstract

The current study explores the application of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) techniques to predict stroke risk, addressing major challenges such as model accuracy, adaptability, feature importance, transparency, and external validation. A quantitative approach is used to evaluate various ML algorithms, and in particular, Random Forest has been highlighted because of its superior predictive accuracy, while stressing the adaptability of DL models across different demographic contexts. The study further explores the role of feature significance in enhancing context-specific predictions, the challenges of model explainability in clinical adoption, and the critical importance of external validation in ensuring generalizability. The results underline the transformative potential of ML and DL in advancing personalized healthcare strategies for stroke prediction while identifying existing gaps in transparency and validation practices. This synthesis lays a foundation for future research to standardize external validation protocols and improve model transparency for wider clinical adoption.

References

  1. Deo, R. C. (2015). Machine learning in medicine. Circulation, 132(20), 1920-1930.
  2. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 4765-4774).
  3. Kam, H. J., & Kim, H. Y. (2017). Learning representations for the early detection of stroke using deep learning. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(1), 121.
  4. Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1347-1358.
  5. van der Velden, A., Jaspers, M. W. M., & Elbers, P. W. G. (2021). Machine learning algorithms in clinical settings: A review of their application and impact. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 118, 103790.
  6. Shickel, B., Tighe, P. J., Bihorac, A., & Rashidi, P. (2018). Deep EHR: A survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques for electronic health record (EHR) analysis. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(5), 1589-1604.
  7. Lipton, Z. C. (2016). The mythos of model interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03490.
  8. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135-1144).
  9. Zhang, Z., & Zou, Q. (2019). Advances and challenges of deep learning applications in biomedical informatics. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 20(2), 626-641.
  10. Holzinger, A., Langs, G., Denk, H., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2019). Causality and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 9(4), e1312.
Download PDF

How to Cite

Kanchan Vishwakarma, (2025-02-21 19:18:23.552). Evaluating Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques in Stroke Risk Prediction. Abhi International Journal of Applied Science, Volume zoZTzAC2cvXq8ipTGOd6, Issue 1.