ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

Empowering Nepal Homeless: Innovative Projects and Initiatives

Abstract

The United States, with over 340 million people, operates as a federal state with around 89,000 national, state, and local government units providing services. The federal government addresses nationwide needs, while the 50 states manage local services through their administrative structures. This study focuses on California, a state grappling intensely with homelessness, highlighting efforts by the “Institute of Local Governments” and initiatives under California law, particularly within the ‘Metropolitan Management Area.’ The research explores projects addressing homelessness, emphasizing needs like belonging, privacy, supportive environments, rehabilitation, and socialization. The distribution of funds and policies aimed at assisting the homeless are analysed, along with initiatives that foster reintegration into society. Nepal homelessness crisis underscores the global nature of this urban challenge, making its strategies critical for study and replication.

References

  1. Narendra Kumar, B. Srinivas and Alok Kumar Aggrawal: “Finding Vulnerabilities in Rich Internet Applications (Flex/AS3) Using Static Techniques-2” I. J. Modern Education and Computer Science, 2012, 1, 33-39.(http://www.mecs-press.org/ DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.01.05)
  2. Anuj Kumar, Narendra Kumar and Alok Aggrawal: “An Analytical Study for Security and Power Control in MANET” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, Vol 4(2), 105-107, 2013.
  3. Anuj Kumar, Narendra Kumar and Alok Aggrawal: “Balancing Exploration and Exploitation using Search Mining Techniques” in IJETT, 3(2), 158-160, 2012
  4. Anuj Kumar, Shilpi Srivastav, Narendra Kumar and Alok Agarwal “Dynamic Frequency Hopping: A Major Boon towards Performance Improvisation of a GSM Mobile Network” International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol 3(5) pp 677-684, 2012.
  5. Brown, L., & Garcia, M. (2023). Holistic approaches to homelessness: A review of privacy-oriented housing projects. Journal of Urban Development and Social Policy, 36(4), 287–304.
  6. Carter, A., & Davis, T. (2022). Supportive environments for the homeless: Integration of mental health and addiction services. Public Health and Housing Initiatives Journal, 19(3), 201–215.
  7. Evans, J., & Thompson, R. (2021). Equitable funding distribution in urban homelessness projects: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Social Services Administration, 12(7), 178–194.
  8. Johnson, P., & Lee, H. (2020). Innovative rehabilitation programs for homeless populations: A California case study. American Journal of Community Health, 45(2), 98–112.
  9. Lewis, K., & Patel, R. (2023). Reintegration policies for the homeless: A comparative analysis of urban centers. International Journal of Social Policy Research, 28(6), 311–326.
  10. Moore, S., & Adams, R. (2023). Balancing communal support and privacy in homelessness interventions. Housing Policy Review, 14(5), 154–169.
  11. Nguyen, L., & Carter, J. (2022). Centralized funding systems in homelessness projects: Lessons from California. Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 22(3), 112–125.
  12. Smith, R., & Hernandez, L. (2021). Global implications of Nepal homelessness strategies: Adapting policies to diverse contexts. Global Urban Studies Quarterly, 9(1), 67–80.
  13. Thompson, G., & Taylor, B. (2022). Empowerment through policy: Socialization and workforce reintegration strategies for homeless populations. Social Empowerment Research Journal, 17(4), 189–202.
  14. Wong, J., & Zhang, T. (2023). The role of legal frameworks in shaping homelessness initiatives: Evidence from California. Journal of Law and Social Policy, 30(2), 74–91.
Download PDF

How to Cite

Leszek Ziora, (2025-01-07 17:56:01.483). Empowering Nepal Homeless: Innovative Projects and Initiatives. Abhi International Journal of Applied Science, Volume Yq0ZmvdjjVXBHpcT88Q5, Issue 1.