ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

Predicting Stroke Risk: Machine Learning Approaches and Their Effectiveness

Abstract

This review discusses global trends in stroke resulting in disability and death. As stroke outcomes and their significant impacts are unpredictable, improved predictors are needed. This study evaluates the effectiveness and efficiency of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques in predicting stroke risk in different contexts. A systematic review of existing studies and literature was conducted using the Advanced Publications for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on various ML and DL algorithms used for stroke risk prediction. A total of 31 articles met the final inclusion criteria. This review highlights significant advances in stroke prediction with ML and DL models that can handle complex datasets while achieving high prediction accuracy. However, issues related to external validation, standard definition, and transparency remain unresolved. It is recommended to emphasize the importance of features as they can provide insight into the different risk of stroke across countries. The study also shows that the random forest model is the best model for predicting stroke risk, secondary data produces the largest data, and India, including China, and Bangladesh are the countries with the most research on stroke risk. Machine learning and deep learning provide effective ways to predict stroke risk, improving personalized treatment strategies. Solving existing problems is important for their successful integration into treatment.

References

  1. Chugh, C., & Sharma, A. (2021). Machine learning approaches in stroke prediction: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Systems, 45(6), 112.
  2. Gandomi, A., Haider, M., & Chen, J. (2022). Explainable AI: Concepts, techniques, and applications in healthcare. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 125, 102196.
  3. Lee, H., & Kim, K. (2020). Deep learning for stroke prediction using electronic health records. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 198, 105823.
  4. Liu, J., & Zhou, X. (2022). The role of external validation in machine learning model development for healthcare applications. Journal of Clinical Informatics, 16(3), 245-256.
  5. Zhang, Z., & Shen, L. (2021). Feature selection in machine learning: A focus on context-specific healthcare applications. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 40(4), 1036-1045.
  6. Anuj Kumar, Narendra Kumar and Alok Aggrawal: “An Analytical Study for Security and Power Control in MANET” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, Vol 4(2), 105-107, 2013.
  7. Anuj Kumar, Narendra Kumar and Alok Aggrawal: “Balancing Exploration and Exploitation using Search Mining Techniques” in IJETT, 3(2), 158-160, 2012
  8. Anuj Kumar, Shilpi Srivastav, Narendra Kumar and Alok Agarwal “Dynamic Frequency Hopping: A Major Boon towards Performance Improvisation of a GSM Mobile Network” International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, vol 3(5) pp 677-684, 2012.
  9. Krittanawong, C., et al. (2020). Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: Challenges and perspectives. European Heart Journal, 41(1), 39-40.
  10. King, A., & Patel, A. (2019). A review of data heterogeneity in stroke risk prediction models. Stroke Research and Treatment, 2019, 3037649.
  11. Rajkomar, A., Dean, J., & Kohane, I. (2019). Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 380, 1347-1358.
  12. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.
  13. Yoon, J., & Schaar, M. (2021). Explainable machine learning models for personalized healthcare: A case study on stroke prediction. IEEE Access, 9, 50536-50547.
Download PDF

How to Cite

Sudhir Kumar Sharma, (2025-01-07 17:48:37.998). Predicting Stroke Risk: Machine Learning Approaches and Their Effectiveness. Abhi International Journal of Applied Science, Volume Yq0ZmvdjjVXBHpcT88Q5, Issue 1.