ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

Hierarchical Classification System for Plastics: Balancing Chemical Similarity and Engineering Relevance

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of the Bernstein Basis Function network for reconstructing accurate geometries of bones from medical images. Accurate models of bone geometry are indispensable for biomedical applications, especially in designing customized orthopedic implants. The two-layer neural architecture BBF network uses nonlinear Bernstein polynomials to perform curve and surface fitting, where the generated weights during training act as control points for Bézier curves. The BBF network adjusts the number of basis neurons so that curve fitting accuracy is optimally balanced with smoothness, addressing weaknesses inherent in traditional and earlier neural network methods. The constraints of positional and tangential continuity are incorporated into the learning algorithm to improve geometric consistency. Quantitative analysis has shown that the BBF network significantly improves the precision of curve fitting, reduces the roughness of reconstructions, and outperforms other methods in simulation studies. Experiments in vivo further validate its clinical usability, showing its ability to reproduce complex geometries with high accuracy in bone reproductions. This study also shows that the BBF network can be a crucial innovation in medical imaging where anatomical modeling and personalized medicine can be accomplished robustly. Some limitations include: dependency on certain imaging techniques and dataset biases. As such, the future course of work involves broader validations across various imaging techniques.

References

  1. Ashby, M. F. (2005). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design (3rd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. Focuses on the principles of materials selection for engineering applications, relevant to integrating chemical and engineering criteria.
  2. Van Krevelen, D. W., & Nijenhuis, K. (2009). Properties of Polymers: Their Correlation with Chemical Structure; Their Numerical Estimation and Prediction from Additive Group Contributions (4th ed.). Elsevier. Offers insights into chemical and physical properties of polymers, foundational for plastics classification.
  3. Callister, W. D., & Rethwisch, D. G. (2020). Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction (10th ed.). Wiley. A comprehensive guide to materials science, including the role of microstructural changes in materials properties.
  4. Budinski, K. G., & Budinski, M. K. (2019). Engineering Materials: Properties and Selection (10th ed.). Pearson. Discusses engineering materials' properties, relevant for balancing chemical similarity with engineering needs.
  5. Shah, V. (2007). Handbook of Plastics Testing and Failure Analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley. Explores the relationship between processing, microstructural changes, and plastics' properties, crucial for adaptable classification systems.
  6. Crawford, R. J., & Martin, P. J. (2020). Plastics Engineering (4th ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. Examines engineering applications of plastics and their classification systems. Langer, R., & Tirrell, D. A. (2004). Designing Materials for Biology and Medicine. Nature, 428(6982), 487-492.
  7. Discusses the tailoring of material properties for specific applications, applicable to plastics.
  8. Chung, T. S., & Zhou, Y. (2002). Characterization and Design of High-Performance Polymer Materials. Polymer Journal, 34(7), 512-523.
  9. Details advancements in polymer material design, addressing chemical and physical property integration.
Download PDF

How to Cite

Ivanenko Liudmyla, (2025-01-07 18:40:21.227). Hierarchical Classification System for Plastics: Balancing Chemical Similarity and Engineering Relevance. Abhi International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Engineering, Volume V4Ec02FRqqjuubVTbghK, Issue 1.