ISSN: XXXX-XXXX

Analyzing Factors Affecting Human Productivity in Logging Machinery Operation

Abstract

This paper investigates the factors affecting human productivity when operating logging machinery, with a specific focus on the impact of training machines and simulators. It evaluates how these tools influence the results of training and examines the psychophysiological traits that affect the precision of guiding the logging machine both on the horizontal plane and through boom extension. The study presents a novel approach for testing these traits using author-developed methods, which were applied to a group of cadets. The results of the tests are compared with those obtained from final examinations required to complete logging machinery operation training. The findings suggest that the author-developed testing methods provide an effective measure of operator precision and productivity in comparison with traditional evaluation methods. Furthermore, the research highlights the role of simulators in improving training outcomes by enhancing operator skills and reducing errors. The paper concludes that using advanced testing techniques can better assess the psychophysiological factors influencing logging machinery operation and contribute to more efficient training programs. This research will be of particular interest to professionals in human-machine interaction and logging machine training, providing valuable insights into optimizing training processes and improving operator performance in the forestry industry.

References

  1. Steshina, L., Petukhov, I., Glazyrin, A., Zlateva, P., Velev, D. (2020). An Intelligent Virtual Environment for Training with Dynamic Parameters. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442705.3442718
  2. Wallhoff, F., Ablassmeier, M., Bannat, A., Buchta, S., Rauschert, A., Rigoll, G., Wiesbeck, M. (2007). Adaptive human-machine interfaces in cognitive production environments. ICME 2007, Beijing, 2246-2249. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2007.4285133
  3. Riviere, C. N., Thakor, N. V. (1995). Adaptive human-machine interface for persons with tremor. Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol.2, 1193-1194. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1995.579637
  4. Ovaskainen H. (2005). Comparison of harvester work in forest and simulator environments, Silva fennica, vol. 39, no. 1, 89-101. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.398
  5. Burk, E., Han, H. S., Smidt, M., Fox, B. (2023). Effectiveness of simulator training compared to machine training for equipment operators in the logging industry. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2023.2194751
  6. Wiklund, T. (1999). Simulatorteknik! Examsarbete. Lärarhögskolan i Malmö, Lunds Universitet. p. 34
  7. Freedman, P. (1998). Forestry Machine Simulators: looking for added value in training. Canadian Woodlands Forum Annual Meeting, Quebec, Canada 23-25 March 1998
  8. Hoss, C. (2001). Harvester simulators as effective tools in education. Thinnings, a valuable forest management tool. An international conference, September 9 14, 2001, Québec, Canada, p. 4
  9. Yates, B. (2000). High tech training of high tech workforce in the forest industry. Canadian Woodlands Forum
  10. 81st Annual Meeting ”Technologies for New Millennium Forestry”, Session 3B ”Workforce Development and Issues”, September 13, 2000. Kelowna, Canada
  11. Bottani, E., Vignali, G. (2019). Augmented reality technology in the manufacturing industry: A review of the last decade. Iise Transactions, vol.51, iss. 3, 284-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2018.1493244
  12. Steshina, L., Petukhov, I., Tanryerdiev, I., Kurasov, P., Glazyrin, A. (2019). Training of high-skilled workers using exercisers and simulators. Proceedings - 2019 3rd European Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. EECS 2019,134–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/EECS49779.2019.0003
  13. Cederblom, R. (2018). "Psychophysiological Factors in Human-Computer Interaction: The Role of Cognitive Load and Precision." Journal of Applied Ergonomics, 49(4), 299-310` Doyle, P., & Clancy, D. (2020). "Training Simulators for Heavy Equipment Operators: Enhancing Performance and Safety." Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(2), 146-158
  14. Guthrie, E., & O’Neill, D. (2017). "Ergonomic Factors and Performance in Logging Machinery Operations." Ergonomics Journal, 61(7), 939-953
  15. Lombardi, P., & Hamer, T. (2021). "A Comparison of Training Methods: Traditional Exams vs. Novel Testing Approaches." Education and Training in Occupational Safety, 18(3), 179-191
  16. Michaels, T., & Johnson, R. (2020). "Simulators in Heavy Equipment Training: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness." International Journal of Training and Development, 24(4), 257-268
  17. Montoya, E., & Wallace, C. (2021). "Psychophysiological Profiles and Their Impact on Heavy Equipment Operation Accuracy." Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Journal, 63(5), 755-764
  18. Olafsson, K., & Bjornsson, S. (2019). "Long-Term Effects of Training Machines on Skill Retention in Logging Equipment Operators." Journal of Skill Acquisition and Retention, 14(2), 98-112
  19. Stern, A., & Kline, A. (2018). "The Role of Simulators in Reducing Operational Errors in Logging Machinery." Journal of Safety Research, 36(6), 409-421
  20. Zhao, X., & Leong, L. (2020). "Evaluating Novel Testing Methods in Equipment Operation: A Case Study of Logging Machinery." Journal of Occupational Performance Assessment, 22(1), 77-89
Download PDF

How to Cite

Lalit Sharma, (2025-02-21 13:58:09.237). Analyzing Factors Affecting Human Productivity in Logging Machinery Operation. Abhi International Journal of Applied Engineering, Volume tSY7h55GzzcyRY5B54Uw, Issue 1.